https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128776 The court, presided by VAIDIALINGAM C.A., J., found in favor of the petitioner due to the lack of a genuine opportunity to object to the pre-assessment notice. The deficiencies in the notice regarding the basis for estimation and discrepancies in dates led to the order of assessment being set aside. The assessing authority was directed to reevaluate the assessment, emphasizing the petitioner's right to present objections and supporting materials. The judgment stressed transparency in the assessment process, ultimately allowing the writ petition without costs to either party. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:59:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128776 The court, presided by VAIDIALINGAM C.A., J., found in favor of the petitioner due to the lack of a genuine opportunity to object to the pre-assessment notice. The deficiencies in the notice regarding the basis for estimation and discrepancies in dates led to the order of assessment being set aside. The assessing authority was directed to reevaluate the assessment, emphasizing the petitioner's right to present objections and supporting materials. The judgment stressed transparency in the assessment process, ultimately allowing the writ petition without costs to either party. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 28 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128776