<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 713 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128772</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the service tax had already been paid and the demand for &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039; was unsustainable. The pre-deposit of penalty and interest was waived, and the stay application was allowed. The Revenue was prohibited from taking coercive action until the appeal was disposed of, even after 180 days from the order date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 713 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128772</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the service tax had already been paid and the demand for &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039; was unsustainable. The pre-deposit of penalty and interest was waived, and the stay application was allowed. The Revenue was prohibited from taking coercive action until the appeal was disposed of, even after 180 days from the order date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>