<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (11) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128763</link>
    <description>Crushed and sieved tobacco was treated as having undergone a process of manufacture for sales tax purposes. The court interpreted the exemption notification phrase &quot;subjected to any process of manufacture&quot; in its ordinary sense, not by reference to the special definition in the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Applying the test of whether a commercially different article emerges, it found that crushing and sieving tobacco leaves produced a distinct commercial commodity with a different name. The exemption for tobacco leaves not so processed therefore did not apply, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (11) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128763</link>
      <description>Crushed and sieved tobacco was treated as having undergone a process of manufacture for sales tax purposes. The court interpreted the exemption notification phrase &quot;subjected to any process of manufacture&quot; in its ordinary sense, not by reference to the special definition in the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Applying the test of whether a commercially different article emerges, it found that crushing and sieving tobacco leaves produced a distinct commercial commodity with a different name. The exemption for tobacco leaves not so processed therefore did not apply, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>