<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 712 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that a plea not raised before the lower authorities should ordinarily not be examined for the first time in appeal, but natural justice justified remand so the appellant could place the contention before the original adjudicating authority. The dispute concerned whether commission received from financial institutions and banks was in fact for any service rendered. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, and all issues were kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:40:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 712 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that a plea not raised before the lower authorities should ordinarily not be examined for the first time in appeal, but natural justice justified remand so the appellant could place the contention before the original adjudicating authority. The dispute concerned whether commission received from financial institutions and banks was in fact for any service rendered. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, and all issues were kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>