<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (11) TMI 37 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128754</link>
    <description>The Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1948 was construed to give the Commissioner revisional power to examine subordinate assessments for legality, regularity and propriety, with &quot;propriety&quot; understood broadly to include correctness, justness, accuracy and appropriateness. On that basis, the Commissioner could enhance a best judgment assessment to correct a substantial omission from turnover, including omitted feeding charges for servants, provided notice and opportunity to show cause were given under section 15(5). As the assessee had notice, and the revised assessment was not shown to be excessive or unreasonable, the enhancement in revision was valid and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (11) TMI 37 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128754</link>
      <description>The Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1948 was construed to give the Commissioner revisional power to examine subordinate assessments for legality, regularity and propriety, with &quot;propriety&quot; understood broadly to include correctness, justness, accuracy and appropriateness. On that basis, the Commissioner could enhance a best judgment assessment to correct a substantial omission from turnover, including omitted feeding charges for servants, provided notice and opportunity to show cause were given under section 15(5). As the assessee had notice, and the revised assessment was not shown to be excessive or unreasonable, the enhancement in revision was valid and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>