<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (4) TMI 87 - MAHARASHTRA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128751</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the charges for work and labor should not be included in their taxable turnover. The Court determined that the supply of paper and the printing contract constituted separate transactions, with only the price of the paper being considered for sales tax purposes. The Court criticized the lower authorities for disregarding evidence supporting the existence of distinct contracts and emphasized the importance of proper evaluation of evidence and legal principles in tax matters. The petitioners were awarded costs and entitled to a refund of the amount deposited before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (4) TMI 87 - MAHARASHTRA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128751</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the charges for work and labor should not be included in their taxable turnover. The Court determined that the supply of paper and the printing contract constituted separate transactions, with only the price of the paper being considered for sales tax purposes. The Court criticized the lower authorities for disregarding evidence supporting the existence of distinct contracts and emphasized the importance of proper evaluation of evidence and legal principles in tax matters. The petitioners were awarded costs and entitled to a refund of the amount deposited before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>