<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (1) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128736</link>
    <description>Where the statutory rules permit appointment of more than one appellate authority, a duly appointed Additional Judge (Appeals) is competent to hear sales tax appeals, and a jurisdictional objection on that ground fails. In best judgment assessment, if the assessee does not produce correct accounts or reliable material, the value of closing stock may be used to estimate turnover; a commercial connection between stock and turnover supports application of a turnover multiple, and the estimate will be sustained unless shown to be arbitrary or excessive. The reference was answered against the assessee and the revenue&#039;s position was upheld on both questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (1) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128736</link>
      <description>Where the statutory rules permit appointment of more than one appellate authority, a duly appointed Additional Judge (Appeals) is competent to hear sales tax appeals, and a jurisdictional objection on that ground fails. In best judgment assessment, if the assessee does not produce correct accounts or reliable material, the value of closing stock may be used to estimate turnover; a commercial connection between stock and turnover supports application of a turnover multiple, and the estimate will be sustained unless shown to be arbitrary or excessive. The reference was answered against the assessee and the revenue&#039;s position was upheld on both questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>