<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 39 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128722</link>
    <description>Section 21 was construed broadly to permit reassessment of turnover that had escaped assessment for any reason, including inadvertent omission despite disclosure in the return; the reassessment was therefore valid. The retrospective second proviso to section 21, inserted by the 1956 amendment, removed the limitation bar where the assessment was made to give effect to a finding or direction in an order under sections 9, 10 or 11, so the remand-based fresh assessment was not time-barred. Section 21 also did not require fresh information as a precondition for reassessment, and the objection on that ground failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 39 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128722</link>
      <description>Section 21 was construed broadly to permit reassessment of turnover that had escaped assessment for any reason, including inadvertent omission despite disclosure in the return; the reassessment was therefore valid. The retrospective second proviso to section 21, inserted by the 1956 amendment, removed the limitation bar where the assessment was made to give effect to a finding or direction in an order under sections 9, 10 or 11, so the remand-based fresh assessment was not time-barred. Section 21 also did not require fresh information as a precondition for reassessment, and the objection on that ground failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>