<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128704</link>
    <description>Property in materials supplied by a statutory board to its contractors passed to the contractors on deferred payment, and contractual restrictions on removal and inspection did not prevent a transfer of ownership; the supply therefore amounted to a sale. However, sales tax liability also depended on the board being a dealer carrying on the business of selling goods. Because the supplies were incidental to statutory duties, lacked a profit motive, and were not part of a continuous commercial selling activity, the board was not carrying on business as a dealer. The reference was answered for the assessee, with the board held not liable to sales tax on these transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:03:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128704</link>
      <description>Property in materials supplied by a statutory board to its contractors passed to the contractors on deferred payment, and contractual restrictions on removal and inspection did not prevent a transfer of ownership; the supply therefore amounted to a sale. However, sales tax liability also depended on the board being a dealer carrying on the business of selling goods. Because the supplies were incidental to statutory duties, lacked a profit motive, and were not part of a continuous commercial selling activity, the board was not carrying on business as a dealer. The reference was answered for the assessee, with the board held not liable to sales tax on these transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>