<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (4) TMI 49 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128699</link>
    <description>Centrifugal water pumps used to lift water from tube wells were held not to fall within the ordinary meaning of &quot;agricultural implements&quot; under the exemption notification. The Court treated agricultural implements as apparatus or instruments used in agriculture itself, and distinguished pumping water from the agricultural operation of irrigation. It noted that irrigation begins only after water has been drawn and carried towards the land, and that a pump merely lifting water is not itself performing that function. The possible ultimate use of the water for irrigation was insufficient to confer exemption from sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:55:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (4) TMI 49 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128699</link>
      <description>Centrifugal water pumps used to lift water from tube wells were held not to fall within the ordinary meaning of &quot;agricultural implements&quot; under the exemption notification. The Court treated agricultural implements as apparatus or instruments used in agriculture itself, and distinguished pumping water from the agricultural operation of irrigation. It noted that irrigation begins only after water has been drawn and carried towards the land, and that a pump merely lifting water is not itself performing that function. The possible ultimate use of the water for irrigation was insufficient to confer exemption from sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>