<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 37 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128698</link>
    <description>An appeal memorandum must be accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of the tax admitted to be due, because the proviso treats contemporaneous proof of payment as a condition precedent to entertainment of the appeal. Filing payment challans later does not satisfy that statutory requirement, and the appeal rules cannot override the mandate by creating a relation-back fiction. The power to return an appeal for correction cannot be used to cure non-compliance with the requirement that proof of payment be filed with the memorandum within limitation. The admitted-tax defect therefore remains uncured and the appeal is not entertainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:48:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 37 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128698</link>
      <description>An appeal memorandum must be accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of the tax admitted to be due, because the proviso treats contemporaneous proof of payment as a condition precedent to entertainment of the appeal. Filing payment challans later does not satisfy that statutory requirement, and the appeal rules cannot override the mandate by creating a relation-back fiction. The power to return an appeal for correction cannot be used to cure non-compliance with the requirement that proof of payment be filed with the memorandum within limitation. The admitted-tax defect therefore remains uncured and the appeal is not entertainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>