<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 875 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128696</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, subject to verification by the Adjudicating Authority of the actual receipt of the value of taxable services during the relevant period. The judge found merit in the Revenue&#039;s argument that the respondent must produce evidence of paying Service Tax on the actual amount of interest received, directing them to provide the necessary documents for verification. The order was modified to include this directive, with the Department instructed to verify the documents as directed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal was disposed of with these terms, emphasizing the need for proof of tax payment on the actual interest received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:11:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 875 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128696</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, subject to verification by the Adjudicating Authority of the actual receipt of the value of taxable services during the relevant period. The judge found merit in the Revenue&#039;s argument that the respondent must produce evidence of paying Service Tax on the actual amount of interest received, directing them to provide the necessary documents for verification. The order was modified to include this directive, with the Department instructed to verify the documents as directed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal was disposed of with these terms, emphasizing the need for proof of tax payment on the actual interest received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>