<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (5) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128692</link>
    <description>Fraudulent suppression of turnover by forged invoices and false statements constitutes evasion of tax legally due under the general charging provision, even if a single-point taxation notification is ineffective for want of supporting rules; liability under the penal provision for fraudulent evasion therefore remains. A Sales Tax Officer, despite exercising quasi-judicial assessment functions, is an assessing and taxing authority and not a court for the complaint-bar rule in criminal procedure. As a result, the absence of a prior complaint by that officer does not prevent prosecution for forgery-related offences, and the convictions were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (5) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128692</link>
      <description>Fraudulent suppression of turnover by forged invoices and false statements constitutes evasion of tax legally due under the general charging provision, even if a single-point taxation notification is ineffective for want of supporting rules; liability under the penal provision for fraudulent evasion therefore remains. A Sales Tax Officer, despite exercising quasi-judicial assessment functions, is an assessing and taxing authority and not a court for the complaint-bar rule in criminal procedure. As a result, the absence of a prior complaint by that officer does not prevent prosecution for forgery-related offences, and the convictions were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>