<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 515 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128684</link>
    <description>For Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, duly addressing and posting a demand notice to the drawer&#039;s correct address satisfies the requirement of &quot;giving notice&quot;; actual receipt is not invariably necessary. A returned notice marked &quot;house locked&quot; does not, by itself, justify dismissal of the complaint at the threshold, because service and any allegation of evasion must be assessed on evidence at trial. The statutory scheme and the presumption under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act support service where notice is properly dispatched, unless the contrary is proved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 515 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128684</link>
      <description>For Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, duly addressing and posting a demand notice to the drawer&#039;s correct address satisfies the requirement of &quot;giving notice&quot;; actual receipt is not invariably necessary. A returned notice marked &quot;house locked&quot; does not, by itself, justify dismissal of the complaint at the threshold, because service and any allegation of evasion must be assessed on evidence at trial. The statutory scheme and the presumption under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act support service where notice is properly dispatched, unless the contrary is proved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>