<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (4) TMI 43 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128677</link>
    <description>An earlier application was not a bar to a later request for recovery under section 13(3)(b) because the Magistrate had not decided that prayer and had only dealt with the prosecution aspect; the later application was therefore treated as a continuation for that undisposed relief. A dealer who defaulted in paying Central sales tax became liable to penalty under section 13(2) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act because section 9(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act applied the State machinery for assessment, collection and enforcement, including the statutory consequence of default. The revision was rejected and recovery with penalty was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (4) TMI 43 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128677</link>
      <description>An earlier application was not a bar to a later request for recovery under section 13(3)(b) because the Magistrate had not decided that prayer and had only dealt with the prosecution aspect; the later application was therefore treated as a continuation for that undisposed relief. A dealer who defaulted in paying Central sales tax became liable to penalty under section 13(2) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act because section 9(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act applied the State machinery for assessment, collection and enforcement, including the statutory consequence of default. The revision was rejected and recovery with penalty was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>