<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 750 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the remaining balance of service tax, education cess, and penalty as a pre-deposit requirement for the appellants, citing a significant initial deposit and ordered against coercive measures. The Tribunal refrained from definitively classifying the hospital construction as Commercial and Industrial Construction Services or for profit-making purposes, acknowledging the divergent arguments. Despite the Revenue&#039;s push for payment and a High Court precedent, the Tribunal decided to waive the outstanding dues, considering the complexity of the tax liability issue and the partial deposit by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:54:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 750 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the remaining balance of service tax, education cess, and penalty as a pre-deposit requirement for the appellants, citing a significant initial deposit and ordered against coercive measures. The Tribunal refrained from definitively classifying the hospital construction as Commercial and Industrial Construction Services or for profit-making purposes, acknowledging the divergent arguments. Despite the Revenue&#039;s push for payment and a High Court precedent, the Tribunal decided to waive the outstanding dues, considering the complexity of the tax liability issue and the partial deposit by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>