<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (4) TMI 29 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128617</link>
    <description>Supply of brass sheets and rings against customer-supplied copper scrap was treated as a sale under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, because the parties contemplated transfer of property in goods for valuable consideration. The assessee received scrap, added other metal, and returned brass sheets of a different commodity, with the value difference adjusted by credit note. On those facts, the transaction involved two independent transfers with ascertainable value and was not a mere bailment, pure conversion of the same material, or a works contract. The disputed turnover was therefore taxable, and the revision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:42:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (4) TMI 29 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128617</link>
      <description>Supply of brass sheets and rings against customer-supplied copper scrap was treated as a sale under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, because the parties contemplated transfer of property in goods for valuable consideration. The assessee received scrap, added other metal, and returned brass sheets of a different commodity, with the value difference adjusted by credit note. On those facts, the transaction involved two independent transfers with ascertainable value and was not a mere bailment, pure conversion of the same material, or a works contract. The disputed turnover was therefore taxable, and the revision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>