<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 635 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128604</link>
    <description>The court upheld the appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision dismissing the appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit order. It emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s power to review decisions under the FEMA Act, 1999, and ruled that the petitioner should seek review from the Tribunal rather than the court. The respondents were restrained from executing the order temporarily, and the court discharged the rule without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 635 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128604</link>
      <description>The court upheld the appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision dismissing the appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit order. It emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s power to review decisions under the FEMA Act, 1999, and ruled that the petitioner should seek review from the Tribunal rather than the court. The respondents were restrained from executing the order temporarily, and the court discharged the rule without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>