<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 748 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128599</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to a misunderstanding regarding the applicable law. The error was acknowledged by the Departmental Representative, and the order was set aside for reconsideration of the condonation of delay application by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:04:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 748 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128599</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to a misunderstanding regarding the applicable law. The error was acknowledged by the Departmental Representative, and the order was set aside for reconsideration of the condonation of delay application by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>