<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 747 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specific amount within a given timeframe for one appeal while waiving the pre-deposit of the remaining tax and penalties until the final appeal disposal. No pre-deposit was ordered for the other appeal. The stay petitions were disposed of accordingly, providing a structured resolution to the tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:51:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 747 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specific amount within a given timeframe for one appeal while waiving the pre-deposit of the remaining tax and penalties until the final appeal disposal. No pre-deposit was ordered for the other appeal. The stay petitions were disposed of accordingly, providing a structured resolution to the tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>