<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 606 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128595</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Rule 12(8) may be initiated on fresh material showing escaped or under-assessed turnover, even where that material was not part of the original assessment record. Pending second appeal against the original assessment does not bar reassessment when the escaped turnover is a distinct subject-matter not earlier adjudicated. Appellate enhancement, however, is confined to the subject-matter considered in the assessment order and cannot rely on later-discovered adverse material; such material must be addressed through reassessment, not enhancement. The writ challenge therefore failed and the assessee was left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 606 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128595</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Rule 12(8) may be initiated on fresh material showing escaped or under-assessed turnover, even where that material was not part of the original assessment record. Pending second appeal against the original assessment does not bar reassessment when the escaped turnover is a distinct subject-matter not earlier adjudicated. Appellate enhancement, however, is confined to the subject-matter considered in the assessment order and cannot rely on later-discovered adverse material; such material must be addressed through reassessment, not enhancement. The writ challenge therefore failed and the assessee was left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>