<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 743 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128588</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of adjudged dues related to service tax liabilities under the &#039;Goods Transport Agency&#039; category. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice in determining the appellant&#039;s liability. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal, considering the appellant&#039;s prima facie case against the adjudged demand of service tax, interest, and penalties. The judgment provided relief to the appellant based on the identified issues and arguments presented during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 743 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128588</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of adjudged dues related to service tax liabilities under the &#039;Goods Transport Agency&#039; category. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice in determining the appellant&#039;s liability. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal, considering the appellant&#039;s prima facie case against the adjudged demand of service tax, interest, and penalties. The judgment provided relief to the appellant based on the identified issues and arguments presented during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>