<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (8) TMI 55 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128577</link>
    <description>An exemption claim for silver wire failed because &quot;kalabattu&quot; was understood as gold or silver thread made by twisting wire with silk or cotton, not wire simpliciter. The assessee&#039;s own statement supported that distinction, so silver wire alone did not squarely fall within the exempted description and the burden of proving exemption was not discharged. The assessment also survived challenge based on information obtained behind the assessee&#039;s back, because that material only reinforced an independent conclusion reached from the dictionary meaning and the assessee&#039;s own books. The writ petition was therefore unsuccessful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:11:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (8) TMI 55 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128577</link>
      <description>An exemption claim for silver wire failed because &quot;kalabattu&quot; was understood as gold or silver thread made by twisting wire with silk or cotton, not wire simpliciter. The assessee&#039;s own statement supported that distinction, so silver wire alone did not squarely fall within the exempted description and the burden of proving exemption was not discharged. The assessment also survived challenge based on information obtained behind the assessee&#039;s back, because that material only reinforced an independent conclusion reached from the dictionary meaning and the assessee&#039;s own books. The writ petition was therefore unsuccessful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>