<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (8) TMI 36 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128571</link>
    <description>The Court held that purchases of cotton from Bombay dealers were genuinely inter-State and not subject to tax under the State law. However, the turnover from the sale of yarn was deemed not to be inter-State sales and was to be taxed under the Act. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioners on the cotton purchases but upheld the decision on the yarn sales. Another turnover of cotton purchases was also found to be inter-State. No costs were awarded in both petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (8) TMI 36 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128571</link>
      <description>The Court held that purchases of cotton from Bombay dealers were genuinely inter-State and not subject to tax under the State law. However, the turnover from the sale of yarn was deemed not to be inter-State sales and was to be taxed under the Act. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioners on the cotton purchases but upheld the decision on the yarn sales. Another turnover of cotton purchases was also found to be inter-State. No costs were awarded in both petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>