<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 598 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128560</link>
    <description>A composite works contract for installation and commissioning was treated as falling within an issue already covered by earlier decisions, including one affirmed by the Supreme Court and followed in later cases. The demand of service tax had been confirmed after extending the benefit of abatement under Notification No. 19/5/2003, and the Tribunal found the appellant had made out a prima facie case against that demand. On that basis, the dispute was held to be prima facie covered in the appellant&#039;s favour, justifying grant of stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:35:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 598 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128560</link>
      <description>A composite works contract for installation and commissioning was treated as falling within an issue already covered by earlier decisions, including one affirmed by the Supreme Court and followed in later cases. The demand of service tax had been confirmed after extending the benefit of abatement under Notification No. 19/5/2003, and the Tribunal found the appellant had made out a prima facie case against that demand. On that basis, the dispute was held to be prima facie covered in the appellant&#039;s favour, justifying grant of stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>