https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128550 The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal by Shadi Ram Jagan Nath, attributing the delay to non-receipt of the impugned order. The appeal was admitted without the pre-deposit requirement. Regarding the taxability of Business Auxiliary Services, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, noting the absence of a contract and minimal demand involved. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit requirement due to the limited nature of the appellant's role in money transfer. Stay on penalties was granted, with a directive for early listing of appeals and no recovery until disposal, emphasizing a fair adjudication process. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:13:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128550 The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal by Shadi Ram Jagan Nath, attributing the delay to non-receipt of the impugned order. The appeal was admitted without the pre-deposit requirement. Regarding the taxability of Business Auxiliary Services, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, noting the absence of a contract and minimal demand involved. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit requirement due to the limited nature of the appellant's role in money transfer. Stay on penalties was granted, with a directive for early listing of appeals and no recovery until disposal, emphasizing a fair adjudication process. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128550