<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 646 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128542</link>
    <description>Credit eligibility under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules for rent-a-cab, courier, repair and maintenance, manpower recruitment, and management consultancy services required fresh examination because the impugned order did not discuss each service individually or show proper application of mind. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority to reconsider admissibility service by service and to decide the issue after granting the assessee a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:03:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 646 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128542</link>
      <description>Credit eligibility under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules for rent-a-cab, courier, repair and maintenance, manpower recruitment, and management consultancy services required fresh examination because the impugned order did not discuss each service individually or show proper application of mind. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority to reconsider admissibility service by service and to decide the issue after granting the assessee a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>