<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 574 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for condonation of an 8-day delay, which was contested as 13 days by the Counsel. The delay was attributed to late receipt of records, and the Commissioner approved it. The Tribunal granted the appeal to proceed based on a Supreme Court ruling and the Revenue&#039;s satisfactory explanation for the marginal delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 574 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for condonation of an 8-day delay, which was contested as 13 days by the Counsel. The delay was attributed to late receipt of records, and the Commissioner approved it. The Tribunal granted the appeal to proceed based on a Supreme Court ruling and the Revenue&#039;s satisfactory explanation for the marginal delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>