<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 640 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128522</link>
    <description>In proceedings on Customs House Agent service, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for interim relief where Board clarification indicated that statutory levies and reimbursable expenses paid on behalf of clients are excluded from service tax computation, which applies only to gross service charges. On that material, the expenses in the case appeared reimbursable, so waiver of predeposit of service tax, interest and penalty was granted and recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:17:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 640 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128522</link>
      <description>In proceedings on Customs House Agent service, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for interim relief where Board clarification indicated that statutory levies and reimbursable expenses paid on behalf of clients are excluded from service tax computation, which applies only to gross service charges. On that material, the expenses in the case appeared reimbursable, so waiver of predeposit of service tax, interest and penalty was granted and recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>