<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 639 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128518</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the applicants satisfied Condition No. 4 of the franchise agreement but did not warrant a total waiver of the predeposit amount. The appellants were directed to predeposit Rs. 5,00,000/- within eight weeks, with recovery stayed until the appeal&#039;s final disposal. Failure to comply would result in the vacation of stay and dismissal of the appeal. Compliance reporting was ordered for 5-3-2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 639 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128518</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the applicants satisfied Condition No. 4 of the franchise agreement but did not warrant a total waiver of the predeposit amount. The appellants were directed to predeposit Rs. 5,00,000/- within eight weeks, with recovery stayed until the appeal&#039;s final disposal. Failure to comply would result in the vacation of stay and dismissal of the appeal. Compliance reporting was ordered for 5-3-2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>