<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 636 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128500</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore directed the applicant, a selling commission agent, to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 collectively within three months due to the lack of clear evidence on amounts received for specific activities. The Tribunal found that the applicants did not establish a prima facie case for a complete waiver of the Service Tax amount. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit condition for the remaining Service Tax, interest, and penalties was waived, with recovery stayed until the appeals&#039; resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 15:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 636 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128500</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore directed the applicant, a selling commission agent, to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 collectively within three months due to the lack of clear evidence on amounts received for specific activities. The Tribunal found that the applicants did not establish a prima facie case for a complete waiver of the Service Tax amount. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit condition for the remaining Service Tax, interest, and penalties was waived, with recovery stayed until the appeals&#039; resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>