<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (8) TMI 24 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128492</link>
    <description>Section 14 of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906 requires an old monetary value in a notification or other instrument to be substituted by its exact equivalent in new coinage at the prescribed conversion rate. The rounding-off language in section 14(2) applies only when coins are actually tendered in payment or on account, and is not imported into section 14(3). Accordingly, a value expressed in annas may be converted into naye paise even if the result contains a fraction, and the fraction need not be ignored at the substitution stage. The construction requiring mandatory rounding off was rejected, and the impugned tax liability was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (8) TMI 24 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128492</link>
      <description>Section 14 of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906 requires an old monetary value in a notification or other instrument to be substituted by its exact equivalent in new coinage at the prescribed conversion rate. The rounding-off language in section 14(2) applies only when coins are actually tendered in payment or on account, and is not imported into section 14(3). Accordingly, a value expressed in annas may be converted into naye paise even if the result contains a fraction, and the fraction need not be ignored at the substitution stage. The construction requiring mandatory rounding off was rejected, and the impugned tax liability was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>