<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 70 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128490</link>
    <description>A reassessment was upheld as within limitation because the period during which a High Court stay prevented the assessing authority from acting had to be excluded from the limitation computation. The governing limitation rule was treated as procedural and capable of applying to a pending matter where the right to act had not become barred. Applying the principle that a litigant should not suffer from delay caused by a court order, the reassessment was held valid in time and the challenge on limitation failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 70 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128490</link>
      <description>A reassessment was upheld as within limitation because the period during which a High Court stay prevented the assessing authority from acting had to be excluded from the limitation computation. The governing limitation rule was treated as procedural and capable of applying to a pending matter where the right to act had not become barred. Applying the principle that a litigant should not suffer from delay caused by a court order, the reassessment was held valid in time and the challenge on limitation failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>