<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 586 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that design and drawing charges should be included in the Assessable Value of goods manufactured. Applicants were directed to deposit an additional Rs. 17,00,000 within four weeks, in addition to the amount already paid, to waive the pre-deposit requirement for the remaining duty, penalty, and interest. Compliance by a specified date was mandated. The judgment emphasizes the importance of including such charges in the Assessable Value and complying with Service Tax obligations to demonstrate good faith. The Tribunal&#039;s balanced approach in addressing the issues raised by the Applicants is evident in the decision to waive pre-deposit upon the specified additional deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 586 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that design and drawing charges should be included in the Assessable Value of goods manufactured. Applicants were directed to deposit an additional Rs. 17,00,000 within four weeks, in addition to the amount already paid, to waive the pre-deposit requirement for the remaining duty, penalty, and interest. Compliance by a specified date was mandated. The judgment emphasizes the importance of including such charges in the Assessable Value and complying with Service Tax obligations to demonstrate good faith. The Tribunal&#039;s balanced approach in addressing the issues raised by the Applicants is evident in the decision to waive pre-deposit upon the specified additional deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>