<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 733 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128474</link>
    <description>Interim stay granted by the Division Bench was sought to be extended pending hearing of the appeals, and the question was whether coercive recovery should remain suspended while the extension applications were considered. The hearing on the extension applications was adjourned, and the departmental authorities were directed not to take coercive recovery action during the pendency of those applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 11:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 733 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128474</link>
      <description>Interim stay granted by the Division Bench was sought to be extended pending hearing of the appeals, and the question was whether coercive recovery should remain suspended while the extension applications were considered. The hearing on the extension applications was adjourned, and the departmental authorities were directed not to take coercive recovery action during the pendency of those applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>