<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (10) TMI 71 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128473</link>
    <description>Section 28(2) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 allowed inspection of accounts, registers, documents, goods and business premises at reasonable times, but not continuous surveillance. The Court distinguished inspection from watch, holding that inspection means careful scrutiny for a reasonable period, while watch implies constant observation. &quot;At all reasonable times&quot; was construed to permit visits at reasonable intervals suited to the nature and hours of the business, not uninterrupted monitoring throughout the business day. Continuous presence of inspectors for long hours over several days was beyond the statutory power and amounted to harassment. The petitioners were therefore entitled to relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 11:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (10) TMI 71 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128473</link>
      <description>Section 28(2) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 allowed inspection of accounts, registers, documents, goods and business premises at reasonable times, but not continuous surveillance. The Court distinguished inspection from watch, holding that inspection means careful scrutiny for a reasonable period, while watch implies constant observation. &quot;At all reasonable times&quot; was construed to permit visits at reasonable intervals suited to the nature and hours of the business, not uninterrupted monitoring throughout the business day. Continuous presence of inspectors for long hours over several days was beyond the statutory power and amounted to harassment. The petitioners were therefore entitled to relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>