<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (6) TMI 43 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128461</link>
    <description>A contract for supply of fertilizer mixture was held to involve an all-inclusive sale price covering ingredients and manufacturing charges, so the buyer&#039;s supply of groundnut oil-cake did not recharacterise the transaction as a works contract or bailment. Under the statutory meaning of sale and turnover, the total amount stated as consideration in the bill of sale formed taxable turnover. The value of the buyer-supplied ingredient could not be deducted, because it was not an ordinary discount within the rules. The entire agreed price of the fertilizer mixture was therefore includible in turnover, and the claimed deduction was not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 10:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (6) TMI 43 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128461</link>
      <description>A contract for supply of fertilizer mixture was held to involve an all-inclusive sale price covering ingredients and manufacturing charges, so the buyer&#039;s supply of groundnut oil-cake did not recharacterise the transaction as a works contract or bailment. Under the statutory meaning of sale and turnover, the total amount stated as consideration in the bill of sale formed taxable turnover. The value of the buyer-supplied ingredient could not be deducted, because it was not an ordinary discount within the rules. The entire agreed price of the fertilizer mixture was therefore includible in turnover, and the claimed deduction was not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>