<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (6) TMI 18 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128457</link>
    <description>Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act was examined for compliance with Article 14 and Article 303, and was upheld. The provision was held to apply a uniform territorial classification, with any differential practical effect arising from variations in State sales tax laws rather than from the section itself; the classification was therefore valid and not arbitrary. The court also held that Article 303 did not apply because the measure was a taxing law enacted under the Union taxing power, not a trade and commerce entry. Rule 14-A was further upheld as intra vires because the time limit for furnishing Form C was within the prescribed manner of compliance and supported assessment and collection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 09:56:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (6) TMI 18 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128457</link>
      <description>Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act was examined for compliance with Article 14 and Article 303, and was upheld. The provision was held to apply a uniform territorial classification, with any differential practical effect arising from variations in State sales tax laws rather than from the section itself; the classification was therefore valid and not arbitrary. The court also held that Article 303 did not apply because the measure was a taxing law enacted under the Union taxing power, not a trade and commerce entry. Rule 14-A was further upheld as intra vires because the time limit for furnishing Form C was within the prescribed manner of compliance and supported assessment and collection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>