<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (4) TMI 73 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128452</link>
    <description>A duly delegated reassessment power under section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 carried the authority&#039;s satisfaction about escapement, because that satisfaction was an integral limitation on the power rather than a separate personal function. Escaped assessment was to be tested against the dealer&#039;s own assessment for the relevant year, not by whether the same turnover had been assessed in another concern&#039;s name. The reassessment notice was not invalid merely because alternative words were left unscored, as the assessee understood the case to meet and replied. On these grounds, the reassessment notice and order were upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 09:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (4) TMI 73 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128452</link>
      <description>A duly delegated reassessment power under section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 carried the authority&#039;s satisfaction about escapement, because that satisfaction was an integral limitation on the power rather than a separate personal function. Escaped assessment was to be tested against the dealer&#039;s own assessment for the relevant year, not by whether the same turnover had been assessed in another concern&#039;s name. The reassessment notice was not invalid merely because alternative words were left unscored, as the assessee understood the case to meet and replied. On these grounds, the reassessment notice and order were upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>