<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (9) TMI 60 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128447</link>
    <description>Where a statutory definition is made subject to the subject or context, the meaning of &quot;turnover&quot; in a special concessionary provision must be drawn from that provision&#039;s scheme and object rather than from the general definition. The High Court held that section 13(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act used &quot;turnover&quot; only for sales of goods specified in Schedule III, because the licence fee was linked to that limited category and the broader definition would create anomalous results. The rejection of the licence application was therefore set aside and reconsideration was directed on the restricted turnover basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:32:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (9) TMI 60 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128447</link>
      <description>Where a statutory definition is made subject to the subject or context, the meaning of &quot;turnover&quot; in a special concessionary provision must be drawn from that provision&#039;s scheme and object rather than from the general definition. The High Court held that section 13(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act used &quot;turnover&quot; only for sales of goods specified in Schedule III, because the licence fee was linked to that limited category and the broader definition would create anomalous results. The rejection of the licence application was therefore set aside and reconsideration was directed on the restricted turnover basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>