<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 571 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), AHMEDABAD-II</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128439</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s services were found not to fall under Port Services as they were not authorized to operate the entire port. The demand for service tax under Port Services was deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside by the CESTAT, Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:56:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 571 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), AHMEDABAD-II</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128439</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s services were found not to fall under Port Services as they were not authorized to operate the entire port. The demand for service tax under Port Services was deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside by the CESTAT, Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>