<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (7) TMI 66 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128400</link>
    <description>The court upheld the assessment of turnover for a dealer in groundnut oil and cake for the year 1955-56, based on evidence of suppression of sales by the assessee. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments against the additional estimate for the remaining year, the court found substantial material supporting the assessing authority&#039;s estimate. The court distinguished previous judgments cited by the petitioner, emphasizing the concrete evidence of suppression in this case. The revision petition was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the respondent, affirming the validity of the assessment based on concrete evidence rather than mere suspicion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (7) TMI 66 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128400</link>
      <description>The court upheld the assessment of turnover for a dealer in groundnut oil and cake for the year 1955-56, based on evidence of suppression of sales by the assessee. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments against the additional estimate for the remaining year, the court found substantial material supporting the assessing authority&#039;s estimate. The court distinguished previous judgments cited by the petitioner, emphasizing the concrete evidence of suppression in this case. The revision petition was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the respondent, affirming the validity of the assessment based on concrete evidence rather than mere suspicion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>