<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (7) TMI 65 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128399</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC considered whether turnover attributable to materials supplied in executing a works contract was taxable under the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act, 1125. It held that the charging provision, read with the statutory definitions of sale, turnover, dealer, goods and works contract, extended the levy to transfers of property in goods involved in such execution. The court rejected the contention that only goods merely intended for use, rather than actually used, could be taxed, finding that the materials used in the building contract formed part of assessable turnover. The assessment was therefore upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (7) TMI 65 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128399</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC considered whether turnover attributable to materials supplied in executing a works contract was taxable under the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act, 1125. It held that the charging provision, read with the statutory definitions of sale, turnover, dealer, goods and works contract, extended the levy to transfers of property in goods involved in such execution. The court rejected the contention that only goods merely intended for use, rather than actually used, could be taxed, finding that the materials used in the building contract formed part of assessable turnover. The assessment was therefore upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>