<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (7) TMI 64 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128384</link>
    <description>An order summarily rejecting a first appeal for defects or procedural non-compliance is treated as a disposal of the appeal, not a mere administrative step. The statutory right of appeal is to be construed liberally and extends to orders ending the appeal on preliminary grounds such as limitation, incompetence, or irregularity. On that basis, a summary rejection confirms the original order and attracts the further appellate remedy, so a second appeal lies to the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (7) TMI 64 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128384</link>
      <description>An order summarily rejecting a first appeal for defects or procedural non-compliance is treated as a disposal of the appeal, not a mere administrative step. The statutory right of appeal is to be construed liberally and extends to orders ending the appeal on preliminary grounds such as limitation, incompetence, or irregularity. On that basis, a summary rejection confirms the original order and attracts the further appellate remedy, so a second appeal lies to the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>