https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128371 The court upheld the validity of the proviso under section 3(4) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1948, allowing the State Government to modify rules in schedule II for turnover determination. The judgment clarified that delegation of detail-oriented power does not infringe upon essential legislative functions, provided the legislative policy is clear. The petitioner's challenge regarding the delegation of power was dismissed, affirming the State Government's authority to amend schedule II rules within the scope of the Act. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:58:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128371 The court upheld the validity of the proviso under section 3(4) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1948, allowing the State Government to modify rules in schedule II for turnover determination. The judgment clarified that delegation of detail-oriented power does not infringe upon essential legislative functions, provided the legislative policy is clear. The petitioner's challenge regarding the delegation of power was dismissed, affirming the State Government's authority to amend schedule II rules within the scope of the Act. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 20 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128371