<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (11) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128366</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the contract between the petitioner and the railway to be indivisible for construction work. The sales tax assessment imposed on the petitioner for the assessment year 1955-56 was deemed invalid as it misapplied Supreme Court precedent. The High Court held that the petitioner could seek relief through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, allowing the petition and quashing the assessment order and the order of the Judge (Appeals) Sales Tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (11) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128366</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the contract between the petitioner and the railway to be indivisible for construction work. The sales tax assessment imposed on the petitioner for the assessment year 1955-56 was deemed invalid as it misapplied Supreme Court precedent. The High Court held that the petitioner could seek relief through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, allowing the petition and quashing the assessment order and the order of the Judge (Appeals) Sales Tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>