<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (9) TMI 48 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128352</link>
    <description>Tundu tobacco sprinkled with jaggery water, cut into smaller pieces and packed for sale did not undergo a transformation into a commercially different product. Manufacture requires a change in form, quality or utility, and mere handling or division into sale units is insufficient. The tobacco therefore remained raw tobacco rather than a manufactured chewing tobacco product, and tax liability could not be imposed on that basis under the relevant sales tax provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (9) TMI 48 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128352</link>
      <description>Tundu tobacco sprinkled with jaggery water, cut into smaller pieces and packed for sale did not undergo a transformation into a commercially different product. Manufacture requires a change in form, quality or utility, and mere handling or division into sale units is insufficient. The tobacco therefore remained raw tobacco rather than a manufactured chewing tobacco product, and tax liability could not be imposed on that basis under the relevant sales tax provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>