<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (10) TMI 64 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128338</link>
    <description>A cooling plant used in a mercerising process was treated as a refrigerator for purposes of item 69 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953. The Bombay HC applied the ordinary commercial meaning of &quot;refrigerator&quot; and rejected a narrow domestic reading, noting that the entry contained no words limiting it to household use or food preservation. Because the plant cooled caustic soda to a low temperature through a chamber or tank, it fell within the statutory description, and the user&#039;s description of the plant&#039;s function did not control classification. The reference was answered in favour of taxability under that entry, with costs against the dealers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:55:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (10) TMI 64 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128338</link>
      <description>A cooling plant used in a mercerising process was treated as a refrigerator for purposes of item 69 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953. The Bombay HC applied the ordinary commercial meaning of &quot;refrigerator&quot; and rejected a narrow domestic reading, noting that the entry contained no words limiting it to household use or food preservation. Because the plant cooled caustic soda to a low temperature through a chamber or tank, it fell within the statutory description, and the user&#039;s description of the plant&#039;s function did not control classification. The reference was answered in favour of taxability under that entry, with costs against the dealers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>