<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (7) TMI 58 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128326</link>
    <description>An appellate tribunal cannot use additional grounds or additional evidence to reopen an assessment order that has already attained finality because it was never challenged within the statutory time. The appellate power applies only to matters actually pending before it and cannot be expanded to a different concluded order. On that basis, consequential refund relief also fails, because refund cannot be granted where the tribunal lacks jurisdiction to disturb the final assessment. The legal point is that a final assessment cannot be indirectly attacked in a later appeal confined to penalty-related issues, and any relief dependent on such reopening is impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (7) TMI 58 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128326</link>
      <description>An appellate tribunal cannot use additional grounds or additional evidence to reopen an assessment order that has already attained finality because it was never challenged within the statutory time. The appellate power applies only to matters actually pending before it and cannot be expanded to a different concluded order. On that basis, consequential refund relief also fails, because refund cannot be granted where the tribunal lacks jurisdiction to disturb the final assessment. The legal point is that a final assessment cannot be indirectly attacked in a later appeal confined to penalty-related issues, and any relief dependent on such reopening is impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>