<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 682 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128317</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed for remand to the original Adjudicating Authority due to discrepancies in findings and incomplete documentation regarding undervaluation of goods under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a proper review and timely resolution, prompting the appellant to provide additional records for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:58:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 682 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128317</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed for remand to the original Adjudicating Authority due to discrepancies in findings and incomplete documentation regarding undervaluation of goods under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a proper review and timely resolution, prompting the appellant to provide additional records for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>